how long would that take and what is the procedure? thanksWhat is the difference between annulment and nulification of marriage here in the philippines?
Annulment is a process by which a marriage is dissolved because of various reasons one of which is irreconcilable differences. Nullification, on the other hand, is a process that stops the marriage from continuing because it is null and void or invalid from the start. One reason is that one of the contracting parties was a minor at the time of marriage.
How long the process takes depends on how fast and efficient the judge is when penning a decision taking into account that all requirements for the application has been submitted and no postponement on hearings has been done. Your lawyer will advise you on what to do in either of the case.What is the difference between annulment and nulification of marriage here in the philippines?
Annulment and Nullification (Null is the key word ) are the same in the Philippines , it just says that the marriage from the beginning is null and void because one of the partner has Psychological incapacity to contract the marriage (before the marriage that partner has already exhibit y that incapacity ) or that some requirement like permission of parent for minors was not obtained , some documentary requirement was not fulfilled before the marriage.
One most accepted for Annulment is the Psychological incapacity , so you have to have a Psychologist attesting to the mind set of the partner being accused as the party at fault . The marriage will not be annulled if the judge found out that there is connivance on both parties to annul marriage , or the marriage will be annulled because one partner has an extra marital affair , you could only get legal separation .
If one of the party accused for being at fault do not attend the hearing in three separate hearings then the annulment case even with proper notification , will be judged according to the pleadings with the judge and could be sh 6 months , if adversarial then could take two years .My brother in Law's annulment even the wife in US could not attend , it took him more than three years. Rember good lawyers make the difference
annulment is the nulification of marriage. it basically means the marriage is void. not valid. as if the marriage didnt happen. how long it takes depends on the circumstances involving the case. sometimes few months, sometimes years..
you can check this site for info
http://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-phi鈥?/a>
Friday, November 25, 2011
Can a relationship with an Indian guy lead to marriage?
I have a boyfriend who is an international student from India. We have been living together for about a year, but he refuses to tell his family just how close we really are. The best he could do was to casually mention a girfriend to his mother. I have a gut feeling that when he's done with school that will be the end of it. Is this a sign that he's not interested in marriage? If he can't even tell his parents about me, could he really marry me?Can a relationship with an Indian guy lead to marriage?
maby he's afraid to tell his family cause it could be a tradition in his family not to mary other nationality.Can a relationship with an Indian guy lead to marriage?
YEah, well tell me is he a hindu or a Muslim??? shouldve mentioned that. If he is a muslim then he has gone seriously against his religon ( major violation) and is obviously ashamed to tell his family back home. If he is a hindu then again it is considered a violation some how ?? Well i have the same feeling what you have, Ask him directly whats the deal?? If you are too interested ask him if he wants to marry you. If he ays i dunno or is vauge with his answer ,... best to dump him ASAP
now nswer mine
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkkV0EgLDE.jPcGN_nURChnsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090616062232AAhvM1x
yeah he could but I'm not really interested in indian guys so i wouldn't know.
maby he's afraid to tell his family cause it could be a tradition in his family not to mary other nationality.Can a relationship with an Indian guy lead to marriage?
YEah, well tell me is he a hindu or a Muslim??? shouldve mentioned that. If he is a muslim then he has gone seriously against his religon ( major violation) and is obviously ashamed to tell his family back home. If he is a hindu then again it is considered a violation some how ?? Well i have the same feeling what you have, Ask him directly whats the deal?? If you are too interested ask him if he wants to marry you. If he ays i dunno or is vauge with his answer ,... best to dump him ASAP
now nswer mine
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkkV0EgLDE.jPcGN_nURChnsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090616062232AAhvM1x
yeah he could but I'm not really interested in indian guys so i wouldn't know.
What we called in english for that kind of marriage?
what we call in English for a kind of marriage where a set of bride and groom,say 25 are going to marry instantly at a stage infront of a large crowd.What we called in english for that kind of marriage?
I think you might mean ';multiple weddings';, where lots of couples get married together, all at once. There have been weddings like this in the Mormon church, I believe.What we called in english for that kind of marriage?
Instantly? means you are going to get married very quick, in that case it would be an ';elopement';
But you said in front of a large crowd which would mean a ';wedding';
Usually both don't happen at the same time
I am guessing that you are referring to a ';wedding';.
I think you might mean ';multiple weddings';, where lots of couples get married together, all at once. There have been weddings like this in the Mormon church, I believe.What we called in english for that kind of marriage?
Instantly? means you are going to get married very quick, in that case it would be an ';elopement';
But you said in front of a large crowd which would mean a ';wedding';
Usually both don't happen at the same time
I am guessing that you are referring to a ';wedding';.
What task does Penelope tell the suitors that they must perform to win her hand in marriage?
From the book, ';The Odyssey';eye color
Would redefining marriage to include nonmating relationships encourage cohabitation among mating couples?
Thought experiment: Suppose we redefined ';high school diploma'; to mean a document available to anyone with ';equivalent life experiences.'; Anyone who claimed equivalent life experiences could appear at the local school board, sign an affidavit, and receive a diploma. Would that change in definition influence the study habits and attendance of present high school students, exerting an influence on the drop-out rate?
It seems to me that those who argue that redefining marriage would have no affect on actual marriage would have to argue that redefining a high school diploma would have no affect on study habits, attendance, or the dropout rate. Where am I going wrong?Would redefining marriage to include nonmating relationships encourage cohabitation among mating couples?
Obviously, your example of the redefinition of a diploma would change the study habits of high school, and the validity of the document as well. Sort of like a doctor claiming that his life experience would qualify him for a medical degree. Rather silly.
By the same circumstance, the institution of marriage would be affected likewise. Not only would it change, but it would be devalued as well. Sadly, this is the direction we have taken, and will achieve, as more and more states opt to support it, and the liberal view that spawned it.
Keep in mind also, that the institution of marriage was a device God created, and by that action, only He qualifies as the party with the ability to change it.Would redefining marriage to include nonmating relationships encourage cohabitation among mating couples?
I was in the supermarket tonight and say more than a few (apparently) unmarried couples shopping together. My guess is they're cohabitating. I wonder where this will go as we look back in a few decades. I personally believe that cohabitation ultimately HURTS the woman and gives the man an excuse to shirk responsibility while getting a bill-paying f#$%-buddy.
I think the redefining of out matrist state into a utopian mindset has played up the apparent invincibility of the female. Never mind that biology does not observe the flavor of the month liberalism that pervades this society.
Homosexual marriage advocates are of two groups: (1) sophomoric intellects and (2) gays that want a something for nothing.
Ultimately, will this be the downfall of western society? I say that a nation is built on principles and morals. Is this true???
You cannot redefine marriage as it is supposed to be. In that case you would only be adjusting for one's personal egoism and how he thinks it would be better for him. There is no compromising with God. You can do that in everything but it would be a waste of time.
what does homosexuality have to do with a high school diploma?
one is a preference and the other a document of achievement
your premise is flawed.....how do you qualifiy your statement?
Marriage is not prohibited among couples who do not intend to have children, and Christian marriages have historically included sterile ones.
Strawman. Try again.
Banning homosexuals from enjoying the same right of marriage that heterosexuals do is like banning homosexuals from getting a high school education using your example.
That is where you are going wrong.
Redefining marriage will not change the fact that marriage is between a ';man'; and a ';woman';.
It's not a fair comparison, because you would have to prove that you have ';equivalent life experiences.'; And guess what? We already have a system like that. It's called the GED. If you drop out of school and then decide to have a high school diploma, you have to take a test to prove you have similar knowledge as one who stayed in high school until graduation. If you pass the test, you get your GED - which is pretty much the same as a high school diploma. With a GED you can get into college, get better jobs, etc. Does it have any affect on those who stayed in school? Not really. People who choose to drop out pretty much already have their minds made up, and it's up to them to get their GED if they so choose. The ones that want to stay in school do just that. Just because there are multiple ways to get the same thing doesn't mean that one way is better than another. We all need individual paths in order to reach the same goal.
The point is, marriage is a personal RIGHT, and every human being should receive the same rights. It's pretty plain and simple. No government has any right to tell human beings whom they are allowed to marry or give special privileges to certain couples but not others. Make it equal, or do away with marriage altogether.
you went wrong comparing marriage to a hs diploma
you also went wrong using the word non-mating relationships in place of homosexual relationships.
Marriage by the state((civil ceremony)) doesn't mention god,jesus,allah or billy bubba bible chucker in its content what so ever..it is a civil contract between two adults and should be free from discrimination based on gender..It is free from discrimination based on race,creed ETC so why not gender?
Now look at the hypocrisy of the United States:
All states allow one man and one woman to be legally married.
some allow same sex marriage and some do not allow same sex marriages...seems logical right...ok
now the Hypocrisy is that in ALL 50 states in the union allow marriage between a Man and another Man who has had sexual rreassignment
surgery to change his male genitals over to female...they also allow marriage between a Woman and another Woman who has had sexual rreassignment surgery to change her female genitals over to male..
So as you can plainly see it is not a matter of redefining what marriage is...it is a matter of defining physical genitalia...
The penis goes with the vagina and vice versa even if said penis or vagina was artificially created by surgery!
This is all because of the infestation of religion within our government.And the christian obsession with what types of sexual acts adults are preforming in their own homes.
If they would spend as much time on doing good work as they do on watching and protesting homosexuals and fearing an end to all mankind becuase everyone will turn gay and no one will have babies,maybe there wouldnt be so many homeless abused children on the streets
It seems to me that those who argue that redefining marriage would have no affect on actual marriage would have to argue that redefining a high school diploma would have no affect on study habits, attendance, or the dropout rate. Where am I going wrong?Would redefining marriage to include nonmating relationships encourage cohabitation among mating couples?
Obviously, your example of the redefinition of a diploma would change the study habits of high school, and the validity of the document as well. Sort of like a doctor claiming that his life experience would qualify him for a medical degree. Rather silly.
By the same circumstance, the institution of marriage would be affected likewise. Not only would it change, but it would be devalued as well. Sadly, this is the direction we have taken, and will achieve, as more and more states opt to support it, and the liberal view that spawned it.
Keep in mind also, that the institution of marriage was a device God created, and by that action, only He qualifies as the party with the ability to change it.Would redefining marriage to include nonmating relationships encourage cohabitation among mating couples?
I was in the supermarket tonight and say more than a few (apparently) unmarried couples shopping together. My guess is they're cohabitating. I wonder where this will go as we look back in a few decades. I personally believe that cohabitation ultimately HURTS the woman and gives the man an excuse to shirk responsibility while getting a bill-paying f#$%-buddy.
I think the redefining of out matrist state into a utopian mindset has played up the apparent invincibility of the female. Never mind that biology does not observe the flavor of the month liberalism that pervades this society.
Homosexual marriage advocates are of two groups: (1) sophomoric intellects and (2) gays that want a something for nothing.
Ultimately, will this be the downfall of western society? I say that a nation is built on principles and morals. Is this true???
You cannot redefine marriage as it is supposed to be. In that case you would only be adjusting for one's personal egoism and how he thinks it would be better for him. There is no compromising with God. You can do that in everything but it would be a waste of time.
what does homosexuality have to do with a high school diploma?
one is a preference and the other a document of achievement
your premise is flawed.....how do you qualifiy your statement?
Marriage is not prohibited among couples who do not intend to have children, and Christian marriages have historically included sterile ones.
Strawman. Try again.
Banning homosexuals from enjoying the same right of marriage that heterosexuals do is like banning homosexuals from getting a high school education using your example.
That is where you are going wrong.
Redefining marriage will not change the fact that marriage is between a ';man'; and a ';woman';.
It's not a fair comparison, because you would have to prove that you have ';equivalent life experiences.'; And guess what? We already have a system like that. It's called the GED. If you drop out of school and then decide to have a high school diploma, you have to take a test to prove you have similar knowledge as one who stayed in high school until graduation. If you pass the test, you get your GED - which is pretty much the same as a high school diploma. With a GED you can get into college, get better jobs, etc. Does it have any affect on those who stayed in school? Not really. People who choose to drop out pretty much already have their minds made up, and it's up to them to get their GED if they so choose. The ones that want to stay in school do just that. Just because there are multiple ways to get the same thing doesn't mean that one way is better than another. We all need individual paths in order to reach the same goal.
The point is, marriage is a personal RIGHT, and every human being should receive the same rights. It's pretty plain and simple. No government has any right to tell human beings whom they are allowed to marry or give special privileges to certain couples but not others. Make it equal, or do away with marriage altogether.
you went wrong comparing marriage to a hs diploma
you also went wrong using the word non-mating relationships in place of homosexual relationships.
Marriage by the state((civil ceremony)) doesn't mention god,jesus,allah or billy bubba bible chucker in its content what so ever..it is a civil contract between two adults and should be free from discrimination based on gender..It is free from discrimination based on race,creed ETC so why not gender?
Now look at the hypocrisy of the United States:
All states allow one man and one woman to be legally married.
some allow same sex marriage and some do not allow same sex marriages...seems logical right...ok
now the Hypocrisy is that in ALL 50 states in the union allow marriage between a Man and another Man who has had sexual rreassignment
surgery to change his male genitals over to female...they also allow marriage between a Woman and another Woman who has had sexual rreassignment surgery to change her female genitals over to male..
So as you can plainly see it is not a matter of redefining what marriage is...it is a matter of defining physical genitalia...
The penis goes with the vagina and vice versa even if said penis or vagina was artificially created by surgery!
This is all because of the infestation of religion within our government.And the christian obsession with what types of sexual acts adults are preforming in their own homes.
If they would spend as much time on doing good work as they do on watching and protesting homosexuals and fearing an end to all mankind becuase everyone will turn gay and no one will have babies,maybe there wouldnt be so many homeless abused children on the streets
If gay marriage become legal, would you practice abstinence?
I mean, for gays and lesbians.
I asked this question a few months ago, I just wondering what would be the answer now.
Mini poll: Pizza or Pancake?If gay marriage become legal, would you practice abstinence?
Good question.
And no. ^.^ I'm really responsible and picky as it is, though.
MP: Pizza.If gay marriage become legal, would you practice abstinence?
I used to go to conservative churches that teach that abstinence crap, and I learned that the leaders of these churches actually crack jokes about 30 and 40 year-old virgins behind their backs. Now I just send my Christian friends to the site below which debunks the whole thing against premarital sex in the Bible. It covers same-sex lifestyles too. I hope it helps you.
Well..i don't practice abstinence now and don't have plans for it wither in future!!
;)
But..I think most homosexuals will not practice abstinence only IF they were doing it so for the legalization of gay marriages!!
MP:Surly a PIZZA!!
From what I've heard, abstinence among gays and lesbians is extremely rare. What you mean is ';chastity'; or ';faithfulness'; in which case I see no correlation, as normal people cheat on their spouses all the time.
No, but I'm very responsible and won't just sleep with anyone. I'd have to know them for a while. And I mean Really know them.
Pizza (veggie supreme!!)
I fail to see how the two are linked any more after legalization of gay marriage than they would be before?
Sorry, it just may be my standpoint, but I just don't see cause and efect.
I would like to be married after 23 or 25 so for to wait that long is not a possibility, but that does not mean I will be promiscuous.
Why would I practice abstinence??
Pizza.
Of course I would. I intend to anyway, I'm still a virgin. %26lt;3
Pancake.
what does being gay have to does gay marriage have to do with abstinence? people are going to do the same that they did before marriage was legal
me personally no but if my girlfriend wants to than i will try it.
organic cheese pizza
Why would they?
I asked this question a few months ago, I just wondering what would be the answer now.
Mini poll: Pizza or Pancake?If gay marriage become legal, would you practice abstinence?
Good question.
And no. ^.^ I'm really responsible and picky as it is, though.
MP: Pizza.If gay marriage become legal, would you practice abstinence?
I used to go to conservative churches that teach that abstinence crap, and I learned that the leaders of these churches actually crack jokes about 30 and 40 year-old virgins behind their backs. Now I just send my Christian friends to the site below which debunks the whole thing against premarital sex in the Bible. It covers same-sex lifestyles too. I hope it helps you.
Well..i don't practice abstinence now and don't have plans for it wither in future!!
;)
But..I think most homosexuals will not practice abstinence only IF they were doing it so for the legalization of gay marriages!!
MP:Surly a PIZZA!!
From what I've heard, abstinence among gays and lesbians is extremely rare. What you mean is ';chastity'; or ';faithfulness'; in which case I see no correlation, as normal people cheat on their spouses all the time.
No, but I'm very responsible and won't just sleep with anyone. I'd have to know them for a while. And I mean Really know them.
Pizza (veggie supreme!!)
I fail to see how the two are linked any more after legalization of gay marriage than they would be before?
Sorry, it just may be my standpoint, but I just don't see cause and efect.
I would like to be married after 23 or 25 so for to wait that long is not a possibility, but that does not mean I will be promiscuous.
Why would I practice abstinence??
Pizza.
Of course I would. I intend to anyway, I'm still a virgin. %26lt;3
Pancake.
what does being gay have to does gay marriage have to do with abstinence? people are going to do the same that they did before marriage was legal
me personally no but if my girlfriend wants to than i will try it.
organic cheese pizza
Why would they?
Don't gays want societies approval for same sex marriage just so they can feel better about themselves?
Why should the majority bend and we all pretend that their lifestyles are normal and call it a marriage?
Why is it up to the rest of us to make them feel normal?
Most of the world does not allow this but gays act like we are the only ones that are backwards,
Whats wrong with letting them have civil unions then call it a day?
Even president Obama says marriage is between a man %26amp; a woman.Don't gays want societies approval for same sex marriage just so they can feel better about themselves?
you're right! just like those silly blacks wanted to vote and marry outside their race just to feel better about themselves.Don't gays want societies approval for same sex marriage just so they can feel better about themselves?
Your post is spot on. It's all about easing their burning conscience to what they themselves know is wrong. I saw the testimony of an ex homosexual not to long ago who had become Christian, and he was dying on his death bed with aids, and a Christian pastor who had lead him to Christ went into see him, and he told the pastor before dying he said '; Please don't stop preaching to homosexuals about Christ, they know their life style is wrong, they are just in denial about it'; and he went on to tell the pastor, that some of the most militant homosexuals are the ones who's conscience convict them the most, which is the reason for their behavior. It's was a really profound testimony. If i knew where I had seen it, I would post a link so you could read it. God bless.
No I want the same rights as you have! I can have my spiritual marriage but I want legal benefits too. I don't need your approval. IF you look back in history you will see there has been gay marriage in almost every culture in the past.
Civil unions will not work because separate is NOT equal and never will be.
President Obama isn't for gay marriage but he isn't against it either. He's the best the gay community has had. He was against prop 8 and wants to get rid of ';don't ask, don't tell';
Edit: Why do people care so much about me? It's kind of flattering but annoying at the same time. I was born and and I will die gay. I have ben gay for as long as I can remember. Even if I wasn't, why would people care?? It's my life.
We shouldn't have to bend. And I think it's pretty messed up that the majority has spoken (voted it down) and some states like Iowa seem to think that those voices were invalid, and what they think is more fit for the state's people. If the govt wants it to happen then that's what we have to live with.
Marriage is a religious sacrament. Gays contradict the bible. When you put two and two together you will find that gays cannot technically be married.
Besides a civil union is the same thing so why do gays have to be labeled as ';married.'; Get a civil union and tell your friends and family you're married- problem solved.
This anti-gay marriage rubbish is getting very boring now.
This is what really annoys me about christians, republicans and the other various breeds of criminals and illiterates who go on about it.
They keep going on and on ad-infinitum about the same old cr*p endlessly and needlessly.
You dont control the World (mainly because you're stupid..) get over it.
Homosexuality, regardless of the claims of gay activists, is a LEARNED behavior, influenced by experiences of the person when they are growing up. Parental non-involvement with sexual education, curiosity, whatever.
OR so they can transfer property within their union without paying gift taxes OR so they can get health care coverage under one partners job OR so they can get a better tax rate OR because they love one another and want to be formally married...
Because it's not equal. Are you just asking this question so you can get a few approvers to feel better about yourself?
who gave a **** what obam says their is nothing worng whith a mam and a man if u have one email magicsloan@yahoo.com
yes I know they are just perverts and freaks
Why is it up to the rest of us to make them feel normal?
Most of the world does not allow this but gays act like we are the only ones that are backwards,
Whats wrong with letting them have civil unions then call it a day?
Even president Obama says marriage is between a man %26amp; a woman.Don't gays want societies approval for same sex marriage just so they can feel better about themselves?
you're right! just like those silly blacks wanted to vote and marry outside their race just to feel better about themselves.Don't gays want societies approval for same sex marriage just so they can feel better about themselves?
Your post is spot on. It's all about easing their burning conscience to what they themselves know is wrong. I saw the testimony of an ex homosexual not to long ago who had become Christian, and he was dying on his death bed with aids, and a Christian pastor who had lead him to Christ went into see him, and he told the pastor before dying he said '; Please don't stop preaching to homosexuals about Christ, they know their life style is wrong, they are just in denial about it'; and he went on to tell the pastor, that some of the most militant homosexuals are the ones who's conscience convict them the most, which is the reason for their behavior. It's was a really profound testimony. If i knew where I had seen it, I would post a link so you could read it. God bless.
No I want the same rights as you have! I can have my spiritual marriage but I want legal benefits too. I don't need your approval. IF you look back in history you will see there has been gay marriage in almost every culture in the past.
Civil unions will not work because separate is NOT equal and never will be.
President Obama isn't for gay marriage but he isn't against it either. He's the best the gay community has had. He was against prop 8 and wants to get rid of ';don't ask, don't tell';
Edit: Why do people care so much about me? It's kind of flattering but annoying at the same time. I was born and and I will die gay. I have ben gay for as long as I can remember. Even if I wasn't, why would people care?? It's my life.
We shouldn't have to bend. And I think it's pretty messed up that the majority has spoken (voted it down) and some states like Iowa seem to think that those voices were invalid, and what they think is more fit for the state's people. If the govt wants it to happen then that's what we have to live with.
Marriage is a religious sacrament. Gays contradict the bible. When you put two and two together you will find that gays cannot technically be married.
Besides a civil union is the same thing so why do gays have to be labeled as ';married.'; Get a civil union and tell your friends and family you're married- problem solved.
This anti-gay marriage rubbish is getting very boring now.
This is what really annoys me about christians, republicans and the other various breeds of criminals and illiterates who go on about it.
They keep going on and on ad-infinitum about the same old cr*p endlessly and needlessly.
You dont control the World (mainly because you're stupid..) get over it.
Homosexuality, regardless of the claims of gay activists, is a LEARNED behavior, influenced by experiences of the person when they are growing up. Parental non-involvement with sexual education, curiosity, whatever.
OR so they can transfer property within their union without paying gift taxes OR so they can get health care coverage under one partners job OR so they can get a better tax rate OR because they love one another and want to be formally married...
Because it's not equal. Are you just asking this question so you can get a few approvers to feel better about yourself?
who gave a **** what obam says their is nothing worng whith a mam and a man if u have one email magicsloan@yahoo.com
yes I know they are just perverts and freaks
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)